The Nissan Club banner

2013 Pathfinder - MAF Sensor Programming

997 Views 8 Replies 5 Participants Last post by  Bob Fields
I need to replace the MAF Sensor and I have been reading lots of posts about this. There is one that concerns me very much regarding the sensor needing to be programmed by the dealer.
I have read many times that "sometimes" it needs programming, which doesn't make any sense. It's either it does or it doesn't need programming.

My problem is that I took the car to the local PepBoys and they didn't want to replace it because "it needs to be programmed by the dealer".

Any experience on this?
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
Nissan in my view miswrote the MAP software to find out later the MAPs can hit internal limits that pop codes too quick and too easy once they get some mileage on them. Whether or not it was done intentionally is anybody's guess but I lean toward them doing it. The problem showed up in Ghozn era cars as did some other funny things and I don't have any faith in those people at all.

You can change the sensor and wipe the code but if it comes back pretty quick you will have to get a software re=write for it.

Several models have trouble with it and all you can do is get in line.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I need to replace the MAF Sensor and I have been reading lots of posts about this. There is one that concerns me very much regarding the sensor needing to be programmed by the dealer.
I have read many times that "sometimes" it needs programming, which doesn't make any sense. It's either it does or it doesn't need programming.

My problem is that I took the car to the local PepBoys and they didn't want to replace it because "it needs to be programmed by the dealer".

Any experience on this?
Have you tried cleaning it? I can't count the times I have gotten or seen that code, and out of hundreds of times, maybe 1000's lol of times I have only replaced 1 MAF roflmao Put a new air filter in and make sure all of the intake tubing is clear of leaves ect.
Can try but code may well come back up. Scan through posts here, a lot of people have the problem. Nissan will point to the sensor but not admit any fault there.

Ford pulled the same stunt on TPS switches there the cure was to make the replacement switch totally unavailable unless you bought a new $250 throttle body to go with it. Pretty CS if you ask me. I created a workaround using a cheap $24 switch that modded slightly fixed the issue 100% and forever.
I need to replace the MAF Sensor and I have been reading lots of posts about this. There is one that concerns me very much regarding the sensor needing to be programmed by the dealer.
I have read many times that "sometimes" it needs programming, which doesn't make any sense. It's either it does or it doesn't need programming.

My problem is that I took the car to the local PepBoys and they didn't want to replace it because "it needs to be programmed by the dealer".

Any experience on this?
I have never heard of a MAF sensor needing to be programmed before? The computer gets a reading from the sensor and adjusts automatically??? You can't program a sensor, only a computer. The computer should automatically adjust to the sensor reading. If it had to be reprogramed then why does your car run if it is no longer in spec, it adjusts automatically. Or is your Pathfinder running? Maybe they mean for the check engine light? Take both battery cables off of the battery. Put the cables together off of the battery and wire tie them together for 15 minutes. Then put them back on the battery positive first and tighten it then negative tighten it. Code will be gone, this discharges the capacitors and resets the system.
Nah, just like with the video games now they shortchange on the software writing and use the excuse, 'if any problems show up we will fix them on the fly'. Car companies can reprogram the computer to affect every sensor on it in different ways now. All cars get things compensated for with software updates left and right now.

I for one avoid them like the plague...........like the old computer adage says, if it is acting right then DON'T go trying to improve it. It was either Toyota or Nissan just a few years baxk that was sending updates to cars just newly out and one of the computer updates turned the cars into bricks, they wouldn't start anfd acted like no key was present at all. That one got into the news. Bad software to correct the bad software.

My son, avid gamer, says now if you buy a new video game before you can even play it you must download up to an hour of new updates since things have changed since the games were 'finished'. Finished my butt.

Nissan saying your CVT trans needs updating is a notable one, they commonly tell you you need one to get the cash when trans is acting up and then the update often makes trans worse to where you have to change it. BEWARE. The update is a reasonable one that bumps the line pressure up slightly with age of car and can work fine but if the usual CVT wonky wear out has shown up it will push the car off a cliff.

The MAF deal............the sensor besides working numbers also has parameter limits that if it gets into signal the computer that the MAF is bad or has something wrong with it. The car may well run fine. They typically want to change the sensor then do an update to widen the band so that the limits are no longer hit, and you don't know, what if the sensor has nothing wrong and they simply gave you another of the same type and the only REAL difference was the software update??? See how that works? It's all about getting as much money as they can.

Why your car has no way to check how much transmission fluid is in it? To see what we will put up with.

Just wait until they bolt the hoods shut.
See less See more
Here's one already...............

if there is no performance issues after replacing MAF and the SES light isn't on, then you don't NEED to have it reprogrammed.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Read through the thread and found it quite helpful. Thanks for the suggestions. Hopefully, I get my issue fixed.
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top