The Nissan Club banner
21 - 40 of 118 Posts
That's awesome that your getting that kind of gas mileage out of your 3.5 rob, how many miles are on the vehicle???

I only have 458miles on my 2.5SL but I'm only getting 26-27 with 70%hwy & 30%city.

I know as I put more miles on the car the gas mileage will improve but I'd really like to start seeing 30-31MPG sometime soon.
 
Hmmm... 2.5L .. mileage is slacking now in the cold months.. until the engine/tranny warm up... averaging only 35- 36 mpg now. At least thinking mileage slacked off because of the cold.. this is also post computer reprogramming for that CVT issue.
 
I have about 4500 miles on my 3.5 SL. I get that mileage with pretty conservative driving and acceleration. I've noticed that if I take my foot off the gas...the car takes a long time to slow down....even the rpm doesn't drop very much while I decelerate .....the the speed decreases very slowly. I also display the screen with the sliding mileage screen to show me what's happening based on my driving style.
 
NVNJ that's exactly what I hope to start getting once I put a few more miles on the car.

Even 30 would be great, but 33 would be exceptional.

I'll have to wait and see what happens.
 
With this trip to DC I have about 515 miles on the car. In and around town with some highway I'm averaging about 26 mpg. That's with me being extremey easy on the gas. Even my wife is like 'wtf' because I'm going to easy (not exceeding 2k rpm). Btw as another post stated. It is difficult to keep under 2k rpm when going up a hill.
 
3.5SL- 650 miles so far... mix of 20 mile 70-75mph highway cruises to work and back along with some spirited around town driving giving me an average of 22.5 MPG calculated. Some excessive idling too because of the cold and wanting to keep the car warm. Assuming it'll get a little better, but not stressed if it doesn't.
 
With this trip to DC I have about 515 miles on the car. In and around town with some highway I'm averaging about 26 mpg. That's with me being extremey easy on the gas. Even my wife is like 'wtf' because I'm going to easy (not exceeding 2k rpm). Btw as another post stated. It is difficult to keep under 2k rpm when going up a hill.
Don't try to maintain a low rpm all the time. It could end up burning more gas. If the gears set too low, the engine is struggling to turn and gas supply increased to keep it from stall. Like when you are driving manual shift. Shifting up too early would make you slow and using more gas. Just focus on driving properly and maintain a healthy engine speed. Moderate and smooth acceleration is best. Doing so is good for gas and your engine life.
 
The computer calculated MPG and miles available to drive before running out of gas are fun to watch but not accurate IMO.
I've had the computer read 10% higher or lower than the traditional hand calculated method.
Overall I believe the 27/38 works here in the burbs of Greensboro NC.
Jay
 
The Altima is def better than the Accord when it comes to MPG.

My MPG is actually starting to gain as more miles are being put on the car.

I'm almost at 700 miles and with a combination of driving its creeping up slowly but surely.
 
I have a 3.5SL with 8,200 miles and about half are highway miles, and half city miles. Right now Im getting 25.6 mpg, I leave it in Ds and drive slow sometimes, and sometimes I drive (accelerate) fast. Hell of alot better gas mileage than my last car.
 
mpg on these cars seem pretty good but i think the honda dealer told me the accord is better?
Of course a Honda salesman would tell you that.

Both cars have pretty impressive EPAs but I guess you'd have to drive both and do real world tests and calculations rather than relying on closed environment tests and system calculated MPG.

I'm pretty sure all car companies that boast these inflated EPAs are doing them in unrealistic conditions, so I've come to expect lower MPG than whatever they try to sell me.
 
Of course a Honda salesman would tell you that.

Both cars have pretty impressive EPAs but I guess you'd have to drive both and do real world tests and calculations rather than relying on closed environment tests and system calculated MPG.

I'm pretty sure all car companies that boast these inflated EPAs are doing them in unrealistic conditions, so I've come to expect lower MPG than whatever they try to sell me.


In Throckmorton's never ending quest for 'The Truth', please read this informative tidbit.

How Vehicles Are Tested http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/how_tested.shtml

Notice this important sentence: "Fuel economy is measured under controlled conditions in a laboratory using a standardized test procedure specified by federal law."

I don't know you, but I doubt that you operate your car in a laboratory!

Look closely at each segment of the testing cycle, city, highway, high speed, A/C, and cold temp.

Notice this disclaimer from the EPA: "EPA has improved its methods for estimating fuel economy, but your mileage will still vary."

EPA tests are designed to reflect "typical" driving conditions and driver behavior, but several factors can affect MPG significantly:
•How & Where You Drive
•Vehicle Condition & Maintenance
•Fuel Variations
•Vehicle Variations
•Engine Break-In

Therefore, the EPA ratings are a useful tool for comparing the fuel economies of different vehicles but may not accurately predict the average MPG you will get.
 
21 - 40 of 118 Posts