PLEASE POST YOUR DYNO RESULTS WITH ACTUAL GRAPHS. NO GRAPH, NO POST PERIOD! I WANT TO SEE YOUR CLAIMS!
I decided to post my results I got from just a FUJITA intake.
Note: Power stays flat from 6000 RPM to 6750 RPM and when my car hit 6800 RPM, power actually started to climb slightly. If I had 7200 RPM's to play with, I would have yielded better results. Our camshafts are VERY similar to the ones in the VQ35HR motor which revs to 7500 RPM. Torque figures read low do to the fact that this dynapack reads lower than a dynojet. I will explain this later in this post.
Here is the video of my dyno:
Note: Click on the part where it says "youtube - altima35dyno". For some reason, clicking the actual video doesn't work.
YouTube - Altima35SEdyno
Now just to let you know, this dynapack reads on avearge 8-10% less than the DYNOJET in our area. Here is the video of the comparson between the dynapack I dynoed my car to a dynojet which is only a few blocks away. The owner of the dynapack wanted to proove that his reads much lower.
Link to comparison.
YouTube - Dynapack and DynoJet head to head comparison
Having that said, on the dynojet even with a 8% loss, my car would have made 261 WHP and 235 WTQ.
I decided to post my results I got from just a FUJITA intake.
Note: Power stays flat from 6000 RPM to 6750 RPM and when my car hit 6800 RPM, power actually started to climb slightly. If I had 7200 RPM's to play with, I would have yielded better results. Our camshafts are VERY similar to the ones in the VQ35HR motor which revs to 7500 RPM. Torque figures read low do to the fact that this dynapack reads lower than a dynojet. I will explain this later in this post.

Here is the video of my dyno:
Note: Click on the part where it says "youtube - altima35dyno". For some reason, clicking the actual video doesn't work.
YouTube - Altima35SEdyno
Now just to let you know, this dynapack reads on avearge 8-10% less than the DYNOJET in our area. Here is the video of the comparson between the dynapack I dynoed my car to a dynojet which is only a few blocks away. The owner of the dynapack wanted to proove that his reads much lower.
Link to comparison.
YouTube - Dynapack and DynoJet head to head comparison
Having that said, on the dynojet even with a 8% loss, my car would have made 261 WHP and 235 WTQ.